¿¼ÑÐÓ¢Óï·­ÒëÀúÄêÕæÌâ ÏÂÔØ±¾ÎÄ

ÄÚÈÝ·¢²¼¸üÐÂʱ¼ä : 2025/12/19 21:45:13ÐÇÆÚÒ» ÏÂÃæÊÇÎÄÕµÄÈ«²¿ÄÚÈÝÇëÈÏÕæÔĶÁ¡£

and with all other life forms on this planet Earth.

¡°Anthropology¡± derives from the Greek words ¡°anthropos¡±: ¡°human¡± and ¡°logos¡± the study of.¡± By its very name, anthropology encompasses the study of all humankind.

Anthropology is one of the social sciences.(62)Social science is that branch of intellectual enquiry which seeks to study humans and their endeavors in the same reasoned, orderly, systematic, and dispassioned manner that natural scientists use for the study of natural phenomena.

Social science disciplines include geography, economics, political science, psychology, and sociology. Each of these social sciences has a subfield or specialization which lies particularly close to anthropology.

All the social sciences focus upon the study of humanity. Anthropology is a field-study oriented discipline which makes extensive use of the comparative method in analysis.(63)The emphasis on data gathered first-hand, combined with a cross-cultural perspective brought to the analysis of cultures past and present, makes this study a unique and distinctly important social science.

Anthropological analyses rest heavily upon the concept of culture. Sir Edward Tylor¡¯s formulation of the concept of culture was one of the great intellectual achievements of 19th century science.(64)Tylor defined culture as ¡°¡­that complex whole which includes belief, art, morals, law, custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society.¡± This insight, so profound in its simplicity, opened up an entirely new way of perceiving and understanding human life. Implicit within Tylor¡¯s definition is the concept that culture is learned. shared, and patterned behavior.

(65)Thus, the anthropological concept of ¡°culture,¡± like the concept of ¡°set¡± in mathematics, is an abstract concept which makes possible immense amounts of concrete research and understanding.

¾«ÃÀÒëÎÄ£º

ÈËÀàÎÞʱÎ޵ز»ÔÚ̽¾¿ËûÃÇËù¾ÓסµÄÕâ¸öÊÀ½ç£¬²¢ÇÒ¾ªÌ¾ÓÚËûÃÇËù´¦µÄµØ·½¡£ÈËÀàÓÐ˼Ïë¡¢Óд´ÔìÐÔ£¬¶øÇÒ¾ßÓÐÄÑÒÔÂú×ãµÄÇóÖªÓû¡££¨61£©¶øÇÒ£¬ÈËÀ໹ÓÐÄÜÁ¦¸Ä±ä×Ô¼ºµÄÉú´æ»·¾³£¬´Ó¶øÈÃËùÓÐÆäËûÐÎ̬µÄÉúÃü·þ´ÓÈËÀà×Ô¼º¶ÀÌØµÄÏë·¨ºÍÏëÏó¡£Òò´Ë£¬ÔËÓÃÀä¾²ºÍϵͳµÄ·½·¨¶ÔÈËÀàµÄ¹ã·ºÐÔÓë¶àÑùÐÔ½øÐÐÑо¿£¬ÊÇÖÁ¹ØÖØÒªµÄ¡£ÎÒÃÇÏ£Íûͨ¹ýÕâЩÑо¿»ñµÃµÄ֪ʶ¿ÉÒÔ´Ù½øÈËÓëÈËÖ®¼ä¡¢ÒÔ¼°ÈËÀàÓëµØÇòÉϵÄËùÓÐÆäËûÎïÖÖ¸ü¼ÓºÍгµØ¹²´æ¡£ ¡°ÈËÀàѧ¡±Ò»´ÊÆðÔ´ÓÚÏ£À°Óïanthropos£¨ÈËÀࣩºÍlogos£¨¶ÔÓÚ¡­µÄÑо¿£©¡£¹ËÃû˼Ò壬ÈËÀàѧ°üº¬Á˶ÔÈ«ÈËÀàµÄÑо¿¡£ ÈËÀàѧÊôÓÚÉç»á¿ÆÑ§¡££¨62£©Éç»á¿ÆÑ§ÊÇ֪ʶ̽Ë÷µÄÒ»¸ö·ÖÖ§£¬ËüÁ¦Í¼Ïñ×ÔÈ»¿ÆÑ§ÓÐÑо¿×ÔÈ»ÏÖÏóÄÇÑù£¬ÓÃÀíÐԵġ¢ÓÐÐòµÄ¡¢ÏµÍ³µÄºÍÀä¾²µÄ·½Ê½Ñо¿ÈËÀ༰ÆäÐÐΪ¡£

Éç»á¿ÆÑ§°üÀ¨µØÀíѧ¡¢¾­¼Ãѧ¡¢ÕþÖÎѧ¡¢ÐÄÀíѧºÍÉç»áѧµÈѧ¿Æ¡£Éç»áѧµÄÿһѧ¿Æ¶¼°üº¬Ò»ÃÅÓëÈËÀàѧÃÜÇÐÏà¹ØµÄ·ÖÖ§»òרҵ¡£

Ò»ÇÐÉç»á¿ÆÑ§¶¼ÒÔÑо¿ÈËÀàΪºËÐÄ¡£ÈËÀàѧÊÇÒ»ÃÅÒÔʵµØ¿¼²éΪµ¼ÏòµÄѧ¿Æ£¬ÔÚÑо¿ÖÐÐèÒª¹ã·ºµØÔËÓñȽϷ¨¡££¨63£©Ç¿µ÷ÊÕ¼¯µÚÒ»ÊÖ×ÊÁÏ£¬¼ÓÉÏÔÚ·ÖÎö¹ýÈ¥ºÍÏÖÔÚÎÄ»¯ÐÎ̬ʱ²ÉÓÿçÎÄ»¯Êӽǣ¬Ê¹µÃÕâÒ»Ñо¿³ÉΪһÃŶÀÌØ²¢Çҷdz£ÖØÒªµÄÉç»á¿ÆÑ§¡£

ÈËÀàѧµÄÑо¿Ôںܴó³Ì¶ÈÉÏÈ¡¾öÓÚÎÄ»¯¹ÛÄî¡£°®µÂ»ª?Ì©ÀÕÏÈÉúÌá³öµÄÎÄ»¯¸ÅÄîÊÇÊ®¾ÅÊÀ¼Í½Ü³öµÄÀíÂ۳ɾÍÖ®Ò»¡££¨64£©Ì©ÀÕ°ÑÎÄ»¯¶¨ÒåΪ¡°¡­Ò»¸ö¸´ºÏÕûÌ壬Ëü°üÀ¨ÈË×÷ΪÉç»á³ÉÔ±Ëù»ñµÃµÄÖ÷Ñö¡¢ÒÕÊõ¡¢µÀµÂ¡¢·¨ÂÉ¡¢·çË×ÒÔ¼°ÆäËüÄÜÁ¦ºÍϰ¹ß¡±¡£ÕâÒ»¸ÅÄîËäÈ»¼ò½à£¬µ«È´º¬ÒåÉî¿Ì£¬ËüΪÈÏʶºÍÀí½âÈËÀàÉú»î¿ª´´ÁËÒ»ÌõոеĵÀ·¡£Ì©ÀÕ¹ØÓÚÎÄ»¯µÄ¶¨Ò尵ʾ³öÕâÑùÒ»¸ö¸ÅÄ¼´ÎÄ»¯ÊǺóÌìϰµÃµÄ¡¢ÓëËûÈ˹²ÏíµÄºÍÐγɹ̶¨Ä£Ê½µÄÐÐΪ¡£

£¨65£©Òò´Ë£¬ÈËÀàѧÖеġ°ÎÄ»¯¡±¸ÅÄî¾ÍÏñÊýѧÖС°¼¯¡±µÄ¸ÅÄîÒ»Ñù£¬ÊÇÒ»¸ö³éÏó¸ÅÄî¡£Ëüʹ´óÁ¿µÄ¾ßÌåÑо¿ºÍÈÏʶ³ÉΪ¿ÉÄÜ¡£

ÌâÄ¿½âÎö£º

(61)Furthermore, humans have the ability to modify the environment in which they live, thus subjecting all other life forms to their own peculiar ideas and fancies. ½á¹¹·ÖÎö£º

¸´ºÏ¾ä61) ×´ÓïFurthermore, // Ö÷¾ähumans // have // the ability ºóÖö¨Óïto / modify the environment // ¶¨Óï´Ó¾äin which // they // live, // ½á¹û×´Óïthus // subjecting all other life forms to // their own peculiar ideas and fancies. ´ÊÒåÍÆÇãº

furthermore£º¶øÇÒ£¬´ËÍâ

modify the environment in which they live£º¸Ä±äËûÃǵÄÉú´æ/Ëù¾Óס»·¾³

modify£ºto change in form or character; alter ±ä¸ü£¬ÔÚÐÎʽ»òÌØÕ÷Éϸı䣬ÐÞ¸Ä they£ºÖ¸´ú¡°humans¡±

subjecting all other life forms to ÈÃËùÓÐÆäËüÐÎ̬µÄÉúÃü·þ´Ó?? other life forms = other forms of life ÆäËüÐÎʽµÄÉúÃü peculiar£º¶ÀÌØµÄ£¬ÌØÓеÄ

fancy£ºimagination, especially of a whimsical or fantastic nature ÏëÏó£¬ÓÈÖ¸ÓÐÒìÏëÌ쿪»ò¿ÕÏëµÄÌØÐԵģ¬Ï²ºÃ ²Î¿¼ÒëÎÄ£º

£¨¶øÇÒ/ÁíÍâ/²¢ÇÒ/¸ü½øÒ»²½À´Ëµ/ÉõÖÁ/²»½öÈç´Ë/´ËÍ⣩£¬ÈËÀ໹ÓÐÄÜÁ¦£¨¸Ä±ä/¸ÄÉÆ/¸Ä½ø/¸ÄÔ죩×Ô¼ºµÄÉú´æ»·¾³£¬´Ó¶øÊ¹ËùÓУ¨ÆäËüÐÎ̬µÄÉúÃü/ÆäËûÉúÃüÐÎʽ/ÆäËûÉúÃüÐÎ̬/ÆäËûÐÎʽµÄÉúÃü£©£¨·þ´ÓÓÚ/³ÐÊÜ/¶¼·ûºÏ/°´ÕÕ??À´¸Ä±ä/½«??½øÐиÄÔì/Óë??Ò»ÖÂ/ÊÊÓ¦£©ÈËÀà×Ô¼º¶ÀÌØµÄÏë·¨ºÍÏëÏñ¡£ µÃ·ÖÖØµã£º

¶¨Óï´Ó¾ä£¬¹Ì¶¨¶ÌÓï

(62)Social science is that branch of intellectual enquiry which seeks to study humans and their endeavors in the same reasoned, orderly, systematic, and dispassioned manner that natural scientists use for the study of natural phenomena. ½á¹¹·ÖÎö£º

62) Ö÷¾äSocial science // is // that branch of / intellectual enquiry // ¶¨Óï´Ó¾äwhich // seeks to / study // humans and their endeavors // ·½Ê½×´Óïin the same reasoned, orderly, systematic, and dispassioned manner // ¶¨Óï´Ó¾äthat natural

scientists // use // Ä¿µÄ×´Óïfor the study of / natural phenomena.

´ÊÒåÍÆÇãº

Social science Éç»á¿ÆÑ§

intellectual enquiry ֪ʶ̽¾¿ enquiry = inquiry£ºÌ½¾¿£¬Ì½Ë÷ seek to£ºÊÔͼ£¬Éè·¨

humans and their endeavors ÈËÀ༰ÆäÐÐΪ endeavor£ºÅ¬Á¦

in ? manner ÒÔ??·½Ê½£¬ÓÃ??·½·¨ reasoned ÀíÐ﵀ orderly ÓÐÐòµÄ

dispassioned Àä¾²µÄ

natural phenomena ×ÔÈ»ÏÖÏó ²Î¿¼ÒëÎÄ£º

Éç»á¿ÆÑ§ÊÇ֪ʶ̽Ë÷/̽¾¿/̽ѰµÄÒ»¸ö·ÖÖ§£¬ËüÁ¦Í¼/ÊÔͼ/ÖÂÁ¦ÓÚ/ѰÇóÏñ×ÔÈ»¿ÆÑ§¼ÒÑо¿×ÔÈ»ÏÖÏóÄÇÑù£¬ÓÃÀíÐÔµÄ/ÍÆÀíµÄ¡¢ÓÐÐòµÄ/ÓйæÂɵÄ/ÓÐÌõÀíµÄ/ÓÐÖÈÐòµÄ¡¢ÏµÍ³µÄºÍÀä¾²µÄ/¿Í¹ÛµÄ/²»ÊÜÇéÐ÷Ó°ÏìµÄ£©£¨·½Ê½/·½·¨£©Ñо¿ÈËÀ༰ÆäÐÐΪ¡£ µÃ·ÖÖØµã£º

¶¨Óï´Ó¾ä

(63)The emphasis on data gathered first-hand, combined with a cross-cultural perspective brought to the analysis of cultures past and present, makes this study a unique and distinctly important social science. ½á¹¹·ÖÎö£º

63) Ö÷ÓïThe emphasis on / data / ºóÖö¨Óïgathered first-hand, // combined with // a cross-cultural perspective // brought to // the analysis of / cultures / past and present, // νÓïmakes // this study // a ǰÖö¨Óïunique and distinctly important social science. ´ÊÒåÍÆÇãº

The emphasis¶Ô??µÄÇ¿µ÷£¬¶Ô??µÄÖØÊÓ data gathered first-handËѼ¯µÄµÚÒ»ÊÖ×ÊÁÏ first-hand£ºÖ±½ÓµØ£¬µÚÒ»ÊÖµØ combined with¼ÓÉÏ

a cross-cultural perspective¿çÎÄ»¯ÊÓ½Ç ²Î¿¼ÒëÎÄ£º

£¨Ç¿µ÷/×¢ÖØ/ÖØÊÓ/¶ÔÓÚ??ÖØÊÓ/¶ÔÓÚ??Ç¿µ÷£©£¨ËѼ¯/²É¼¯/ÊÕ¼¯£©µÚÒ»ÊÖ£¨×ÊÁÏ/Êý¾Ý£©£¬£¨¼ÓÉÏ/½áºÏ/Á¬Í¬£©ÔÚ·ÖÎö£¨¹ýÈ¥ºÍÏÖÔÚµÄÎÄ»¯£¨ÐÎ̬£©/¹Å½ñÎÄ»¯/¹ýÈ¥ºÍÏÖÔÚµÄÎÄ»¯ÏÖÏó£©Ê±²ÉÓ㨿çÎÄ»¯/ÎÄ»¯½»»ã/½»²æÎÄ»¯£©£¨ÊÓ½Ç/ÊÓµã/¹Û²ì£©£¬Ê¹ÕâÒ»Ñо¿³ÉΪһÃÅ£¨¶ÀÌØ/¶ÀÒ»ÎÞ¶þ/ÓëÖÚ²»Í¬£©²¢ÇÒ£¨·Ç³£ÖØÒªµÄ/¼«ÎªÖØÒªµÄ/ÌØ±ðÖØÒªµÄ/ÓÐÌØÊâÖØÒªÐԵģ©Éç»á¿ÆÑ§¡£ µÃ·ÖÖØµã£º

¶àÖØ¶¨Óï½á¹¹

(64)Tylor defined culture as ¡°¡­that complex whole which includes belief, art, morals, law, custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as a member of society.¡± ½á¹¹·ÖÎö£º

64) Ö÷¾äTylor // defined culture as // Ö±½ÓÒýÓï\ÒýÓïµÄÖ÷¾äthat complex whole // ¶¨Óï´Ó¾äwhich // includes belief, art, morals, law, custom, / and any other capabilities / and habits // ºóÖö¨Óïacquired by man // as a member of society.\´ÊÒåÍÆÇãº

TylorÈËÃû£¬°´ÕÕÒôÒë¡°Ì©ÀÕ¡±¡£ defined culture as ½«ÎÄ»¯¶¨ÒåΪ that complex whole Ò»¸ö¸´ºÏÌå which£ºÖ¸´ú¡°whole¡±£¬Òë×÷¡°Ëü¡±¡£ morals µÀµÂ

acquire£ºÈ¡µÃ£¬»ñµÃ

man as a member of society ÈË×÷ΪÉç»á³ÉÔ±/×÷ΪÉç»á³ÉÔ±µÄÈË ²Î¿¼ÒëÎÄ£º

Ì©ÀÕ£¨°ÑÎÄ»¯¶¨ÒåΪ/ΪÎÄ»¯ÏµĶ¨ÒåÊÇ/ÊÇÕâÑù¶¨ÒåÎÄ»¯µÄ£©¡°??Ò»¸ö£¨¸´ºÏÕûÌå/¸´ºÏÌå/×ÛºÏÌå/¼¯ºÏÌå/ͳһÌå/¸´ÔÓÕûÌå/×éºÏÌ壩£¬£¨Ëü°üÀ¨ÈË×÷ΪÉç»á³ÉÔ±Ëù»ñµÃµÄÐÅÑö¡¢ÒÕÊõ¡¢µÀµÂ¡¢·¨ÂÉ¡¢·çË×ÒÔ¼°ÆäËüÄÜÁ¦ºÍϰ¹ß/Ëü°üÀ¨£¨ÐÅÑö/ÐÅÄ¡¢ÒÕÊõ¡¢£¨µÀµÂ/Â×Àí£©¡¢·¨ÂÉ¡¢·çË×£¨Ï°¹ß£©ÒÔ¼°ÈË×÷ΪÉç»á³ÉÔ±Ëù£¨»ñµÃ/»ñÈ¡£©µÄÆäËüÄÜÁ¦ºÍϰ¹ß£©¡£¡± µÃ·ÖÖØµã£º

¶¨Óï´Ó¾ä£¬ºóÖö¨Óï

(65)Thus, the anthropological concept of ¡°culture,¡± like the concept of ¡°set¡± in mathematics, is an abstract concept which makes possible immense amounts of concrete research and understanding. ½á¹¹·ÖÎö£º

65) ×´Óï½á¹¹Thus, // Ö÷Óï ¶àÖØ¶¨Óïthe anthropological concept of / \// ²åÈë½á¹¹ ¾ÙÀýlike // ¶àÖØ¶¨Óïthe concept of / \νÓïis // an abstract concept // ¶¨Óï´Ó¾äwhich // makes µ¹×°½á¹¹ // possible // ǰÖö¨Óïimmense amounts of / concrete research and understanding. ´ÊÒåÍÆÇãº

the anthropological concept of \ÈËÀàѧµÄ¡°ÎÄ»¯¡±µÄ¸ÅÄî the concept of \ÊýѧÖС°¼¯ºÏ¡±µÄ¸ÅÄî an abstract concept³éÏó¸ÅÄî

abstract£ºconsidered apart from concrete existence ³éÏóµÄ£¬ºÍÕæÊµ´æÔÚ²»Í¬µÄ which£ºÖ¸´ú¡°concept¡±£¬Òë×÷¡°Ëü¡±¡£ make sth possible ʹµÃ??³ÉΪ¿ÉÄÜ

which makes possible immense amounts of concrete research and understanding£º£¨Ëü/ÕâÖÖ¸ÅÄʹ´óÁ¿µÄ¾ßÌåÑо¿ºÍÈÏʶ£¨³ÉΪ¿ÉÄÜ/ÓпÉÄܽøÐУ©

immense amounts of concrete research´óÁ¿µÄ¾ßÌåÑо¿ ²Î¿¼ÒëÎÄ£º

£¨Òò´Ë/ËùÒÔ£©£¬ÈËÀàѧÖС°ÎÄ»¯¡±µÄ£¨¸ÅÄî/¹ÛÄ¾ÍÏñÊýѧÖС°¼¯ºÏ¡±µÄ¸ÅÄîÒ»Ñù£¬ÊÇÒ»¸ö³éÏó¸ÅÄî¡££¨Ëü/ÕâÖÖ¸ÅÄʹ´óÁ¿µÄ¾ßÌåÑо¿ºÍÈÏʶ£¨³ÉΪ¿ÉÄÜ/ÓпÉÄܽøÐУ©¡£ µÃ·ÖÖØµã£º

²åÈë½á¹¹£¬¶¨Óï´Ó¾ä£¬µ¹×°½á¹¹

11¡¢2004Äê

Directions:

Read the following text carefully and then translate the underlined segments into Chinese. Your translation should be written clearly on ANSWER SHEET 2.(10 points)

The relation of language and mind has interested philosophers for many centuries. (61) The Greeks assumed that the structure of language had some connection with the process of thought, which took root in Europe long before people realized how diverse languages could be. Only recently did linguists begin the serious study of languages that were very different from their own. Two anthropologist-linguists, Franz Boas Edward Sapir, were pioneers in describing many native languages of North and South America during the first half of the twentieth century. (62) We are obliged to them because some of these languages have since vanished, as the peoples who spoke them died out or became assimilated and lost their native languages. Other linguists in the earlier part of this century, however, who were less eager to deal with bizarre data from ¡°exotic¡± language, were not always so grateful. (63) The newly described languages were often so strikingly different from the well studied languages of Europe and Southeast Asia that some scholars even accused Boas and Sapir of fabricating their data. Native American languages are indeed different, so much so in fact that Navajo could be used by the US military as a code during World War II to send secret messages.

Sapir¡¯s pupil, Benjamin Lee Whorf, continued the study of American Indian languages. (64) Being interested in the relationship of language and thought, Whorf developed the idea that the structure of language determines the structure of habitual thought in a society. He reasoned that because the structure of habitual thought in a society. He reasoned that because it is easier to formulate certain concepts and not others in a given language, the speakers of that language think along one track and not along another. (65) Whorf came to believe in a sort of linguistic determinism which, in its strongest form, states that language imprisons the mind, and that the grammatical patterns in a language can produce far-reaching consequences for the culture of a society. Later, this idea became to be known as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, but this term is somewhat inappropriate. Although both Sapir and Whorf emphasized the diversity of languages ,Sapir himself never explicitly supported the notion of linguistic determinism.

¾«ÃÀÒëÎÄ£º

Ðí¶àÊÀ¼ÍÒÔÀ´ÕÜѧ¼ÒÒ»Ö±¶ÔÓïÑÔÓë˼άµÄ¹ØÏµÆÄ¸ÐÐËȤ¡££¨61£©Ï£À°ÈËÈÏΪ£¬ÓïÑԽṹÓë˼ά¹ý³ÌÖ®¼ä´æÔÚ×ÅijÖÖÁªÏµ¡£ÕâÒ»¹ÛµãÔÚÈËÃÇÉÐδÈÏʶµ½ÓïÑÔµÄǧ²îÍò±ðÒÔǰ¾ÍÔçÒÑÔÚÅ·ÖÞÔúÏÂÁ˸ù¡£Ö±µ½×î½üÓïÑÔѧ¼Ò²Å¿ªÊ¼ÈÏÕæÑо¿Óë×Ô¼ºµÄĸÓï½ØÈ»²»Í¬µÄÓïÑÔ¡£Á½Î»ÈËÀàѧ¼Ò¡¢ÓïÑÔѧ¼Ò·ðÀÊ´Ä¡¤²©¶ò˹ºÍ°®µÂ»ª¡¤ÈøÆ¤¶ûÔÚ¶þÊ®ÊÀ¼ÍÉϰëÒ¶ÃèÊöÁ˱±ÃÀºÍÄÏÃÀÐí¶àÍÁÖøÓïÑÔ£¬ÔÚÕâ·½ÃæËûÃÇ¿°³ÆÏÈÇý¡££¨62£©ÎÒÃÇÖ®ËùÒԸм¤ËûÃÇ£¨Á½Î»ÎÞÇý£©£¬ÊÇÒòΪÔÚ´ËÖ®ºó£¬ÕâЩ£¨ÍÁÖø£©ÓïÑÔÖÐÓÐһЩÒѾ­²»¸´´æÔÚÁË£¬ÕâÊÇÓÉÓÚ˵ÕâЩÓïÑԵIJ¿×å»òÊÇÏûÍöÁË£¬»òÊDZ»Í¬»¯¶øÉ¥Ê§ÁË×Ô¼ºµÄ±¾×åÓïÑÔ¡£²»¹ý£¬ÔÚ¸ÃÊÀ¼ÍÔçÆÚÆäËûÓïÑÔѧ¼Ò²¢²»ÄÇôÈÈÐÄ´¦Àí¡°ÒìÓò¡±ÓïÑÔÖеĹÖÒìÊý¾Ý£¬Òò´ËËûÃdz£²»±»ÈËÃÇËù³ÆµÀ¡££¨63£©ÕâЩнü±»ÃèÊöµÄÓïÑÔÓëÒѾ­µÃµ½³ä·ÖÑо¿µÄÅ·Ö޺Ͷ«ÄÏÑǵØÇøµÄÓïÑÔÍùÍù²î±ðÏÔÖø£¬ÒÔÖÁÓÚÓÐЩѧÕßÉõÖÁÖ¸Ô𲩶ò˹ºÍÈøÆ¤¶û±àÔìÁ˲ÄÁÏ¡£ÃÀÖÞÍÁÖøÓïÑÔµÄÈ·Ê®·ÖÌØÒ죬ÄÉÍß»ôÓïʵ¼ÊÉÏÔÚ¶þÕ½ÖпÉÒÔ±»ÃÀ¾üÓÃ×÷ÃÜÂë·¢ÃÜÂëµç±¨¡£

ÈøÆ¤¶ûµÄѧÉú±¾½ÜÃ÷¡¤ÀÎÖ·ò¼ÌÐøÑо¿ÃÀÖÞÓ¡µÚ°²È˵ÄÓïÑÔ¡££¨64£©ÎÖ·ò¶ÔÓïÑÔÓë˼άµÄ¹ØÏµºÜ¸ÐÐËȤ£¬Öð½¥ÐγÉÁËÕâÑùµÄ¹Ûµã:ÔÚÒ»¸öÉç»áÖУ¬ÓïÑԵĽṹ¾ö¶¨Ï°¹ß˼άµÄ½á¹¹¡£ËûÂÛÊö˵£¬Ä³Ò»Ìض¨ÓïÑÔÖбȽÏ