内容发布更新时间 : 2024/6/16 3:43:37星期一 下面是文章的全部内容请认真阅读。

GMAT语法：Like用法总结及题目训练(1)

一．Like用法总结原则一：like比较的是名词和名词。要找准比较对象。原则二：Justlike是wordy,like就可以了。Like**,**also也是redundant。原则三：要把like的句子改写成as（连词）引导的从句的话，要补上从句的谓语动词（或助动词），并且该动词和主句的动词应该没有逻辑上的矛盾。1.as作连词，like作介词时，才可表示”象...一样”2.like和as的优缺点like优点是，直接接名词，简洁，比as灵活，象得没as那么象。但有时太灵活以至导致歧义(e.g.,og060.A)。相比之下as的优点是准确，缺点是过于死板，以致于有时导致逻辑上不通。（e.g.,og119.C)3.like常用于比较名词，作独立成分，大部分时候出现在句首。(e.g.,og091)但

like+n.也可作表语

(lookslike,readslike(e.g.,大全568))，或普通状语（说普通是区分独立成分）(v.+like+n.,e.g.,og119)。平时我们说“worklikeadog”,即属此类。4.当like+n.作状语时，象所有的介词短语作状语一样，要考虑它在句中的位置和用来修饰什么，不可导致歧义。5.当like+n.作状语时，感觉GMAT接受v.+like+n.，很少用v.+n.+like+n.,除非是固定用法（如：treat...like...（大全310））。例如下面的句子，GMAT会认为confusing：Tomdriveshiscarlikeatank.（drivelikeatank,orcarlikeatank?）6.like,as,和asif。当用as和like都感觉不舒服时，用asif＋虚拟语气，尤其用于和假设的事物或事实比较。如上面的句子用as不行，因为Tomdriveshiscarashedrivesatank。显然不妥，因为Tom未必开坦克。但可以这么说：Tomdriveshiscarasifitwereatank。（大全310）7.\和\。表“比如...”，只能用suchas；而表“象...”时，用like。或说，当n2是n1的子集时，用suchas；当n1和n2为平行可比物时，用like。记住suchas一般对，也小心“大全229”那样的陷阱。8.\和\，改成\（e.g.，大全792）9.like和unlike。unlike只作独立成分和表语，没见过unlike作普通状语。Heworksunlikeadog(别扭)。注意\表强调，不要改成\。（e.g.,og051)例：og091：like独立成分，平行比较og060，大全844，大全045：like歧义og119/og189：v.+like普通状语，as过于死板大全310/大全973：asif，treat...like大全568：系表结构，readlike...大全792：likethese=>such+n.大全229：表“象..”，用like，不用suchasog208：表“比如...”，只能用suchas

，

不

用

like

二

．

Og

对

like

的

讲

解

1.Likemanyself-taughtartists,PerleHessingdidnotbegintopaintuntilshewaswellintomiddleage.(A)Like(B)Ashave(C)Justaswith(D)Justlike（A）

(E)AsdidChoiceA,thebestanswer,isconciseandgrammaticallycorrect,usingthecomparativeprepositionliketoexpressthecomparisonbetweenmanyself-taughtartistsandPerleHessing.ChoicesBandE,whichreplaceA’sprepositionalphrasewithclausesintroducedbyas,useauxiliaryverbsthatcannotproperlybecompletedbyanypartoftheverbphraseinthemainclause:neitherhave...didnotbeginnordid...didnotbeginislogicallyorgrammaticallysound.InCandD,JustaswithandJustlikearebothunnecessarywordy.2.LikeAuden,thelanguageofJamesMerrillischatty,arch,andconversational―giventocomplexsyntacticflightsaswellastoprosaicfree-versestrolls.(A)LikeAuden,thelanguageofJamesMerrill(B)LikeAuden,JamesMerrill’slanguage(C)LikeAuden’s,JamesMerrill’slanguage(D)AswithAuden,JamesMerrill’slanguage

（

C

）

(E)AsisAuden’sthelanguageofJamesMerrillAtissueisacomparisonofAuden’slanguagewithMerrill’slanguage.OnlyC,thebestchoice,usestheellipticallikeAuden’s(languagebeingunderstood),tocompareAuden’slanguagewithMerrill’slanguage.A,B,andDcompareAuden(theperson)withMerrill’slanguage.ChoiceEisawkwardandunidiomatic.3.Liketheirmalecounterparts,womenscientistsareaboveaverageintermsofintelligenceandcreativity,butunlikemenofscience,theirfemalecounterpartshavehadtoworkagainstthegrainofoccupationalstereotypingtoentera“man’sworld.”(A)theirfemalecounterpartshavehadtowork(B)theirproblemisworking(C)onethingtheyhavehadtodoiswork(D)thehandicapwomenofsciencehavehadistowork

（

E

）

(E)womenofsciencehavehadtoworkEisthebestchoice.Themeaningiscleardespitetherelativecomplexityofthesentence,thecomparisonofwomenwithmenislogical,andparallelismismaintainedthroughout.InA,theconstructionunlikemenofscience,theirfemalecounterpartsviolatesrulesofparallelismandsyntax.Itwouldbestberenderedasunlikemenofscience,womenofscience....ChoiceBincorrectlysuggeststhatacomparisonisbeingmadebetweenmenofscienceanda.problemfacedbyfemalescientists.InC,thelengthyseparationbetweenwomenandtheymakesthepronounreferencevague,andthecomparisonbetweenmenofscienceandonething(ratherthanwomenofscience)isfaulty.Thephrasingisunnecessarilywordyaswell.ChoiceDintroducesunnecessaryredundancyandawkwardnesswiththeconstructionthehandicapwomen...havehadistowork.ChoiceDalsoincorrectlycomparesmalescientistswithahandicapfacedbyfemalescientists.4.LikeRousseau,Tolstoirebelledagainsttheunnaturalcomplexityofhumanrelation

sinmodernsociety.(A)LikeRousseau,Tolstoirebelled(B)LikeRousseau,Tolstoi’srebellionwas(C)AsRousseau,Tolstoirebelled(D)AsdidRousseau,Tolstoi’srebellionwas

（

A

）

(E)Tolstoi’srebellion,asRousseau’s,wasInchoiceA,the