内容发布更新时间 : 2024/5/18 6:43:58星期一 下面是文章的全部内容请认真阅读。
7. F article 43of the UCP 500 also states :”……if no such period of time is
stipulated, banks will accept……”. Here the L/C stipulated an expiry date of the L/C,
the presentation of documents, therefore, should not exceed that date (September 15) 8. T
9. F article 11 of the UCP 500 reads :” if a bank uses the services of an Advising Bank to have the Credit advised to the Beneficiary, it must also use the services of the same bank for advising an amendment. 10. T
6. F according to article 42of the UCP 500, a freely negotiable credit does not need to “ stipulate a place for negotiation.”
7. F article 43of the UCP 500 also states :”……if no such period of time is
stipulated, banks will accept……”. Here the L/C stipulated an expiry date of the L/C,
the presentation of documents, therefore, should not exceed that date (September 15) 8. T
9. F article 11 of the UCP 500 reads :” if a bank uses the services of an Advising Bank to have the Credit advised to the Beneficiary, it must also use the services of the same bank for advising an amendment. 10. T
Ⅳ. Read the bill of exchange below and answer questions. 1. Drawer: Henan native produce 2. 4th DEC, 1999 3. two copies 4. US$63,162.00
5. Unite States Dollars Sixty Three Thousand One Hundred And Sixty Two Only 6. The sender's place is on the bottom right and the receiver's is on the bottom left 7. 90 days 8. LC
9. US dollars, number, letter of credit, company Ⅴ. Case Study
1.[Answer]: It seems that the seller delivered the goods more than what was
stipulated in the contract; therefore, according to Article 52 of the CISG, the buyer may refuse to take delivery of the excess quantity delivered. However, in this case because of the ignorance of the staff concerned, difference occurred between the actual goods delivered and the quantity specified in documents. What’s sunny is that the weight indicated on the documents was the same as that stated in the contract. As a result, the buyer might obtain more without paying anything. However, the Japanese Customs House discovered the difference between the documents and the actual goods delivered, which cause embarrassement to the Chinese company. The only way of solving the problem, perhaps, was to explain what happened in the factory to the Japanese Customs House.
Although the problem might have been solved, we still have a lot to learn from this case: (1) Strengthen the connection between the sales people and the factory; (2) the export salesman should make the mode of packing clear to the processing factory; (3) the Chinese Customs House must also check the weight of goods against the document; and (4) we should see that there is agreement not only between the documents presented, but also between the documents and the goods.
2.
答:我方处理不恰当。应吸取的教训有：(1)在合同中未规定信用证开到日期不妥；(2)按惯例即使合同未规定开证期限，买方也应于装运月前开到信用证，买方未及时开到信用证，我方应保留索赔权；(3)对于外商以我方未能按时装运为由，单方面宣布解除合同，我方不能就此作罢。
Answer for Chapter 8
1、发票
JIANGSU INTERNATIONAL IMP. & EXP. CORP.LTD
80 ZHONGSHAN ROAD , NANJING, CHINA FAX : 86-025-123456
78
TEL : 86-025-12345678
COMMERCIAL INVOICE TO：
SHEMSY NEGOCE ID CORP. INVOICE NO．：ABC123
75 ROUTE 96570 DARDIUY,FRANCE INVOICE DATE：NOV.20.2008 TEL: 33-56-12345678 S/C NO．：03CAN-1108 FAX: 33-56-12345678 ORDER NO: FE021G
FROM：___SHANGHAI_____________________ TO：_ MARSEILLE PORT BY SEA
MARKS AND NUMBER AND KIND OF PACK- NUMBERS AGE DESCRIPTION OF GOODS SHEMSY LEATHER BAGS MARSEILLE ITEN NO.SL100 FE021G 1-60 ITEN NO.SG120 ITEM NO.SF200 USD3.00/PC TOTAL： 6000PCS USD14000.00
SAY TOTAL：SAY US DOLLARS FOURTEEN THOUSAND ONLY
JIANGSU INTERATIONAL IMP&
EXP.CORP.LTD
80 ZHONGSHAN ROAD, NANJING,CHINA
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1000PCS 2000PCS 3000PCS FOB USD2000.00 SHANGHAI USD3000.00 USD2.00/PC USD9000.00 USD1.50/PC
（STAMP） （signature） 2、箱单
JIANGSU INTERNATIONAL IMP. & EXP. CORP. 80ZHONGSHAN ROAD , NANJING, CHINA TEL : 86-025-12345678 FAX : 86-025-12345678 PACKING LIST
TO: SHEMSY NEGOCE ID CORP. INVOICE NO.：A1001A/20 75ROUTE 96570 DARDILLY,FRANCE DATE: :2008.11.09 FAX: 33-56-12345678 CONTRACT NO.: 03CAN-1109 TEL: 33-56-12345678
FROM: SHANGHAI TO: MARSEILLES BY SEA MARKS & NOS SHEMSY FE022G MARSEILLES NO.1-400 COMMODITY LUGGAGE SET OF 8PCS QUANTINW TY 400SETS 20KGS/CTN GW 22KGS/CTN MEASUREMENT 82.5×25.5×61CM/CTN TOTAL: 400SETS 8000KGS 8800KGS 51.33M3 SAY TOTAL:
SAY TOTAL PACKAGES IS FOUR HUNDRED CARTONS ONLY. JIANGSU INTERATIONAL IMP.&EXP.CORP.LTD 80 ZHONGSHANG ROAD,NANJING,CHINA STAMP
（signature）
Answer for Chapter 9
I. True or false
1. F the injured party cannot rescind the contract, but holds the right of claiming damages.
2. F according to article 18 of the law, the party who has breached the contract can adopt reasonable remedial measures.
3. F it is the CISG that applies” fundamental breach of contract.” 4. T 5. T
6. F according to article 74 of the CISG states, there are 4 conditions on which a
Force Majeure can be established. 7. T 8. T
9. F the conciliator’s suggestion is not a law; therefore, he cannot force the parties in dispute to act on his advice. 10. T
II 单选 ACADD BDAAD
III 多选ADE BD ABCDE ABC CD Ⅳ、案例分析题
1、答：工厂延迟交货，这种行为已经违反了贸易商与工厂签订的合同，因合同中预先已就此种行为作出了赔付5%违约金的规定，所以贸易商完全可以依约向工厂索赔，因为合同是索赔的依据。贸易商在向工厂索赔时应索赔货款的5%。因为他们之间的合同规定是5%，贸易商索赔金额，应依据他跟工厂的合约，而不受他与买方之间的约定的限制与影响。
2、
答：在此种情况下我方不能利用不可抗力条款来免除责任。因为出口公司不能出口不是由于不可抗力事故导致他不能履行义务，而是由于自己的过失，没有对供货市场做深入的调查，没有正确报价造成的。所谓不可抗力是指在货物买卖合同签订以后不是由于订约者任何一方当事人的过失或疏忽，而是由于发生了当事人既不能预见、又无法事先采取措施的意外事故，以致于不能履行或不能如期履行合同。本案例的发生严重水灾很明显是发生在签约之前，出口方完全可以通过调查，然后在签约时制定一个合理的价位。本案例告诉我方：（1）做任何贸易都应做好市场调查工作；（2）进行合理的报价；（3）对不可抗力事故要做到真正理解。