内容发布更新时间 : 2024/11/20 11:41:56星期一 下面是文章的全部内容请认真阅读。
竭诚为您提供优质文档/双击可除
中美司法制度对比
篇一：中美司法法律制度比较
acomparisonofJudicatureandlegalSystembetweenchinaandUS
chinaandtheUnitedStatesaretwomainpowerfulcountiesineconomicandmilitaryfieldsintheworld.nevertheless,inthepoliticalsystemandsocialandculturalaspects,therearemanycrucialdifferencesbetweenthem.Thesedifferencesaretooexcessivetoo
tremendousandtoodeep-going,asaresult,thetwocountiesdivergemarkedlywhenitcomestoalmosteveryinternationalaffair.wedon
’
thavethatwisdomandstrengthofresearchingandprobingthosedifferences.Thatbeingso,let’sgiveitaheadstartinthejudicialsystemandlaw. Judicialsystem
JudicialsystemofUSistotallydifferentfromours.Firstly,america
’
sjudiciaryisonebranchofthatthreebranches—thelegislativebranch,theexecutivebranchandthejudicialbranch.Thosethree branchesdividenationalgovernment
’
spowerintothree.Thisdivisionofauthorityisknownasasystemofchecksand balancesestablishedbytheconstitution,whichismeanttopreventanyofthethreebranchesfromhavingtoomuchpower.Eachbranchhascertaincontrolsovertheotherbranches.Eachbranchcanlimittheotherbranchesfromgainingtoomuch
竭诚为您提供优质文档/双击可除
power.inotherwords,eachbranchofthethreebranchesisequaltoeachother.it’simpossibletoletonebedominatedbyanother.Socourtsinamericadon
’
tcareaboutwhattheadministratorsthink.Theyjustmaketheverdictaccordingtotheconstitutionandlawandonthebasisofevidence.Butinchina,thecaseiscompletelydifferent.inversely,chinagovernmentpursuesthecentralizationpoliticalsystemratherthanthetripartitepoliticalsystemofchecksand balances.Judicialsysteminchinaisnota
partyofchecksandbalances,notatall.moreimportantly,inordertosegmentandweakenjudiciary’spower,statusand
weight,thejudicialsystemitselfhasbeendividedintomanybranches,mainlythecourtandProcuratorate.courtsinchinaisjustalittledepartmentinnationalpoliticalsystem,whichcanbecontrolledandimpactedbymanyothergovernment’sbranches,forexample,nationalPeople
’
scongressStandingcommittee,officeofLegislativeaffairs,judicialbureauandLawcouncilofvariouslevelscPccommitteeandsoon.Tosomedegree,china’s judiciaryisjustamouthpiece.Lawsarejustreference.Leader
’
swritteninstructionorcommentsarerealandpotentialcriterion.Sowecanseethatthestatusand
importanceofjudicialsysteminamericaarehigherandmoresignificantthanitinchina.what
’
smore,america
’
sjudicialsystemisindependentandself-governed,
butamightyandindependentjudicialsystemcan’tbefoundinchina.acase’
竭诚为您提供优质文档/双击可除
saffirmationandverdicthavetobedirectedandinterferedbymanyindividualsandorganizationsinchina.Forinstance,ifagovernment
sleaderorofficialbreaksthelawandcommits,thejudicialdepartmentcan
’’
tacceptthelawsuitandenquirehimatonce,beforethecdic(commissionfordisciplineinspectionofthecPc)
investigatehisbehaviorandmakedecisionthatwhetherheshouldbepushedintothejudicialsystem.iftheoffenderisadepartmentalorhigherlevelcadre,reviewinghimhavetobeapprovedandratifiedbythecentralcommitteeofthecommunistPartyofchina.Thatistosay
，
ifaleaderorofficialkilledhundredsofpeople,rapedhundredsmaidensandcorruptedhundredsmillions,thecourtscan
tdoanythingtohimbeforethecdicconfirmshisatrocitiesandcrimeseven thoughvictimshaveprosecutedhim
thousandstimes.Thusitcanbeseenthatinourcountry,thereexistsanorganizationwhichhasmuchmorepowerandmuchhigherstatusthananyotherorganizations.Beforeitsrules,thelawsarehumble,faintandimpotent.So,whydosomanyunjustandunequaleventstakeplacepervasivelyandconstantly?whydosomanyinnocentpersonshavebeenextortedconfessionsbymeansoftorture?whydothose
malfeasantsandnobleculpritscangetawayunpunishedbeyondthearmofthelawandconstitution.Thereasonisthatwehaven
’’
tacompletelyindependentandadequatelypowerfuljudicialsystemtorestricta